Worked the Common Core Today… And Yet…

I’m still no expert on the new Common Core Standards. After the workshop I attended today, sponsored by DOE Library Services and led by the unstoppable and amazing Olga Nesi, I definitely have a little more purchase on how to work on Common Core lesson planning for the library with my student teachers, and the sense that I have a lot of support in that practice. However, the overwhelming sense I got from this PD (besides being overwhelmed) was ambivalence about these new standards.

Here are a few of my concerns:

1. I felt a lot of push pull in that room today. School librarians are being encouraged to champion the common core because they’re all about research skills, which is what we do. This is our chance to become indispensable!

And yet… we’re also very critical of the fact that there are assessments in Kindergarten, assessments before we’ve actually had time to teach anything, assessments as soon as the kids walk through the door. Do we really want this to be the definitive thing about school library work: that we can support Common Core across the curriculum? Is this what school librarians should be hitching their wagons to? I’m nervous, and I think others are, too.

2. The common core emphasizes process over content. Instead of focusing on teaching facts, we teach students how to gather, articulate, and make inferences from facts in order to create arguments and conclusions. This is a good thing, and again, validates the work of librarians (and philosophers!).

And yet. Do we want to throw the baby out with the bathwater here? What about process AND content?? I’m reminded of Lisa Delpit’s “The Silenced Dialogue,” which argues that the skills/process debate in education is a fallacy, and that what we need to be talking about is how to remedy the fact that some kids desperately need to be taught basic skills before they can engage meaningfully in process-based work. Which leads me to…

3. Equity. This very issue came up today in our workshop, when we were talking about how to scaffold a fairly sophisticated lesson on inference for sixth graders. How can we scaffold this lesson for the students who haven’t had any prior experience with research? Where is equity in the Common Core? It’s still one-size-fits all.

4. The cabinet problem. Olga kept using this analogy today: imagine the Common Core as instructions to build a cabinet. Does it matter if the instructions are about building a cabinet with pine or oak? She argues, not really. What matters is we know and understand how to build the cabinet by following the directions and understand how to use our tools. Ok, I get it. It’s a helpful analogy and it’s powerful. Because for so long, kids haven’t been asked to make anything; they’ve been asked to take tests.

And yet! (I have mixed feelings about the “maker space” trend, but that’s another post…) Where is the criticality in the Common Core? Do we want kids to build IKEA furniture or to IKEA hack? Where is design? Can young people build a better world if all they do is read blueprints, not make blueprints, or dream impossible structures? Or if they don’t care to problematize the blueprints or the structures detailed in them as not accommodating the needs of those who dwell therein? We need to dwell deliberately, critically, and with care!

5. Why should kids care? Can you become Internet Famous if you work the Common Core? Will the Common Core get you to American Idol, the NBA, or any closer to developing the next Apple Corporation? The common core loves non-fiction! And these (rarefied) TRUE STORIES are the stories our kids are loving right now.

And yet!! We still can’t deliver on these “American dreams;” could we possibly alter them? The biggest problem we have might be overcoming our own cultural myths. But that’s another story (pun intended).

About Jessica Hochman

I am an assistant professor at Pratt Institute in the School of Information and Library Science (SILS) where I also coordinate the LMS Program (school librarians, for the uninitiated). I live in Brooklyn, NY.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Worked the Common Core Today… And Yet…

  1. C Fernandes says:

    Bad analogy, there is a difference between oak and pine, if you don’t pay attention to the differences in density and strength you will get bad results with both cabinets.
    As for the “American Dream” ask the indigenous population of these lands whether this “Dream” is really a dream or a nightmare.
    Will the non-fiction “Core” help inform students of the terrible suffering that was a result of
    Euro-colonization. I’ll bet it will have plenty of material covering the Nazis.
    This reeks at best of Hive-mindedness and worse with the spinning of History.
    There is a saying “Cream Rises” in this case it would be “Turds Float”.
    Let’s remember where Fascism originated and look at the people who are trying to revive it.
    When all of our reading material is digitized a real bonfire won’t be needed, just a bonfire app.
    Be careful of who you trust.

  2. Jessica Hochman says:

    C, You’re right that the wood does matter. It’s important to consider the materials and the content of curriculum and the student work produced therein, not just the process or procedure. Clarity and nuance are essential elements to good work. Having said that, I can’t quite tell whether you’re disagreeing with the common core or my post, so I’ll just say thanks for stopping by.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s